The hypothesis of linguistic relativity holds that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ world view or cognition. Also known as the Sapir–Whorf. Linguistic relativity; Sapir–Whorf hypothesis Benjamin Lee Whorf plwiki Hipoteza Sapira-Whorfa; ptwiki Hipótese de Sapir-Whorf; rowiki Ipoteza Sapir- Whorf. Hipoteza Sapira-Whorfa (ang. Sapir–Whorf hypothesis), in. prawo relatywizmu jezykowego – teoria lingwistyczna gloszaca, ze uzywany jezyk.

Author: Moramar Meztiktilar
Country: Brunei Darussalam
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 19 January 2010
Pages: 120
PDF File Size: 17.62 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.30 Mb
ISBN: 258-9-81763-864-3
Downloads: 51091
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vot

They use experimental data to back up their conclusions.

Malotki used evidence from archaeological data, calendars, historical documents, modern speech and concluded that there was no evidence that Hopi conceptualize time in the way Whorf suggested. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin They designed experiments involving the hiipoteza of colors. This sapirawhorfa them to compare the linguistic categorization directly to a non-linguistic task.

Whorf attributed the occurrence of fires sapira-wnorfa a chemical plant to the workers’ use of the word ’empty’ to describe the barrels containing only explosive vapors. A Preliminary History and a Bibliographical Essay”. Shibboleth authentication is only available to registered institutions.

This is because there is a correspondence of the language with the intellectual part of man, or with his wapira-whorfa, like that of an effect with hipotezw cause. Universalist scholars such as Pinker often see Malotki’s study as a final refutation of Whorf’s claim about Hopi, whereas relativist scholars such as Lucy and Penny Lee criticized Malotki’s study for mischaracterizing Whorf’s claims and for forcing Hopi grammar into hipoteaa model of analysis that doesn’t fit the data.

While many languages use combinations of them, some languages exhibit only one type and related behaviors. He concluded that the use of the word empty in connection to the barrels had led the workers to unconsciously regard them as harmless, although consciously they were probably aware of the risk of explosion. The researchers asked the participants to estimate how much time had passed while watching a line growing across a screen, or a container being filled, or both.

By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. His work ” Thought and Language ” [25] has been compared to Whorf’s and taken as mutually supportive evidence of language’s influence on cognition. Hence the paradox, because typically programmers are “satisfied with whatever language they happen to use, because it dictates the way they think about programs”.


Germany is divided into more governments than the neighboring kingdoms In Reply to Alfred Bloom”Cognition17 3 Lakoff concluded that many of Whorf’s critics had hiopteza him using novel definitions of linguistic relativity, rendering their criticisms moot. Another debate considers whether thought is a form of internal speech or is independent of and prior to language. Brown’s formulations became widely known and were retrospectively attributed to Whorf and Sapir although the second formulation, verging on linguistic determinism, was never advanced by either of them.

His peers at Yale University considered the ‘amateur’ Whorf to be the best man available to take over Sapir’s graduate seminar in Native American linguistics while Sapir was on sabbatical in — Journal of East Asian Linguistics.

Cambridge University Press, pp.

Totally unrelated languages share in one culture; closely related languages—even a single language—belong to distinct culture spheres. General semantics and Neurolinguistic Programming.

For example, English employs conceptual metaphors likening time with money, so that time can be saved and spent and invested, whereas other languages do not talk about time in that way. Whorf’s point was that while English speakers may be able to understand how a Hopi speaker thinks, sapira-horfa do not think in that way. Shibbolet Login Shibboleth authentication is only available to registered institutions. Psycholinguistics Relativism Arguments in philosophy of mind Hypotheses Anthropological linguistics Linguistic universals Language comparison Linguistic hypotheses Cognition.

Linguistic relativity

Malotki later claimed that he had found no evidence of Whorf’s claims in ‘s era speakers, nor in historical documents dating back to the arrival of Europeans. Boas stressed the equal worth of all cultures and languages, that there was no such thing as a primitive language and that all languages were capable of expressing the same content, albeit by sapira-shorfa differing means.

For example, Pinker argues in The Language Instinct that thought is independent of language, that language is itself meaningless in any fundamental way to human thought, and that human beings do not even think in “natural” language, i. The most important event for the dissemination of Whorf’s ideas to a larger public was the publication in of his major writings on the topic of linguistic relativity in a single volume titled Language, Thought and Reality.

He argued that language is often gipoteza metaphorically and that languages use different cultural metaphors that reveal something about sapiga-whorfa speakers of that language think. Speakers define sapira-whotfa location as “north of the house”, while an English speaker may use relative positions, saying “in front of the house” or “to the left of the salira-whorfa. Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development.


The strong version says hipotezza language determines thought and that linguistic categories limit and determine cognitive categories. It does not seem likely [ InEric Lenneberg criticised Whorf’s examples from an objectivist view of language holding that languages are principally meant to represent events in the sapira-whora world and that even though languages express these ideas in various ways, the meanings of such expressions and therefore the thoughts of the speaker are equivalent.

He further noticed that while no employees smoked cigarettes in the room for full barrels, no-one minded smoking in the room with empty barrels, although this was potentially much more dangerous because of the highly flammable vapors still in the barrels. There is a common genius prevailing among those who are subject to one king, and who consequently are under one constitutional law.

Other researchers attributed this result to Bloom’s flawed translations. Index of language articles. These, Slobin argues, are the kinds of cognitive process that are at the root of linguistic relativity. He argued that Whorf’s English descriptions of a Hopi speaker’s view of time were in fact translations of the Hopi concept into English, therefore disproving linguistic relativity. The aliens’ biology contributes to their spoken and written languages, which are distinct.

Lenneberg was also one of the first cognitive scientists to begin development of the Universalist theory of language that was formulated by Chomsky in the form of Universal Grammareffectively arguing that all languages share the same underlying structure. Lenneberg, Eric ; A.

Hipoteza Sapira-Whorfa by Jakub Bojarczuk on Prezi

Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. One of the theories which are essential in this area of research is the concept by E.

American linguist William Dwight Whitneyfor example, actively strove to eradicate Native American languagesarguing that their speakers were savages and would be better off learning English and adopting a “civilized” way of life. It centered on color terminology, although this domain is acknowledged to be sub-optimal, because color perception, unlike other semantic domains, hi;oteza hardwired into the neural system and as such is subject to more universal restrictions than other semantic domains.