Julia Jurgenson Writing September 27, Jonah Lehrer’s article “ Groupthink” is mainly about producing new ways of brainstorming. He discusses the. Groupthink: The brainstorming myth. The New Yorker. The ideas presented in Jonah Lehrer’s article were very interesting, especially for someone . And in his New Yorker article, Jonah Lehrer cites research Suffice it to say, we dislike consensus-based “Groupthink” as much as the next.
|Published (Last):||1 December 2011|
|PDF File Size:||18.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.12 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This strategy not only increases the quantity of the ideas, but also improves the quality of the ones already there. Of course the notion that multiple states of bicycle riding do exist has been known for decades. The subject and working terrain of enabling integrative innovation in organizations is unquestionably a moving frontier, forever in motion. How stuff gets done is often about participation, co-framing, buy-in and various social constructions. The so-called first test of brainstorming at Yale University is a prime example.
It would seem, however, that many truths, oral and written, are disguised by slogans and statements. Notify me of new comments via email.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: The method of debating and combining familiar people to create things, such as plays, could be combined to generate the greatest brainstorming technique yet. A basic that Cain does not seem to get is that most working adults grouptink know how to work by themselves, what most seek help with right now, what most missed in most forms of even advanced education, is how to work with other tribes in the context of wicked problems.
People have a belief that their ideas are crazy, but when they try them, they realize the ideas are reasonable and it opens up the doors to them thinking outside of the box as well. One might take into account lwhrer considerations, that bike riding in would probably be different from the bike riding that took place fifty or sixty years ago. I will definitely keep this in mind as I focus on collaboration in my classroom.
Assignment 2: Lehrer “Groupthink” Summary and Analysis
But then again all that eye-ball groupghink drama would have been missed…: Quite apart from the personal attributes of introverts, these are realities in the arena of wicked problems today. Rather, her conclusions augmented the original conclusions.
I love how teachers share offices and sometimes share spaces with non teaching HTH staff.
Finally, Lehrer describes physical spaces where creativity has been proven to thrive. Lehrer then uses a study by the review of over 20 million peer-reviewed academic papers and 2 million patents made in the United States; Lehrer uses pure numbers to test the sleep reader.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: He points to a study by Charlan Nemeth, a ggroupthink of psychology at the University of California at Berkeley, to show that brainstorming with criticism actually gives better creative results!
You are commenting using your Facebook account. On that front I would say she is herself just entering the front door of the learning curve. Uzzi explains that people do not work as well with each other when they do not know each other: In fact, Jones study seemed to clarify discrepancies in the studies of others, like Yale University, that are at odds with Alex Osborn. Evidently not everyone writing about teamwork, brainstorming and collaboration has.
That lack of knowing undermines her relatively simple message that introverts are all around us I am one myself and deserve to be better understood. This building was quick to plan and built out of the cheapest of materials.
Some of us decided years ago not to explicitly focus on the personality dimensions of Myers Briggs, for a multitude of reasons that I will not go into here in this abbreviated post. GroupThink by Jonah Lehrer Entertaining: Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here This mixture meant that the artists could interact efficiently-they had a familiar structure to fall back on-but they also managed to incorporate some new ideas.
This also applies to students. If it is helpful to anyone in this discussion group, I can tell you that we have not seen anything in those two articles or the bandwagon stream following them that would inspire us to change the directions of what we do in the realm of enabling cross-disciplinary cocreation and building integrative thinking capacity. If your organization seeks to build level 10 riders, that academic research is essentially irrelevant. On the Integrative Thinking SoWhat Index I would say the picture of these two articles looks something like this with 10 being highest best score and 0 being lowest score.
By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
Lehrer was just a writer receiving a pittance for his article, with no resources to do a research piece. Whether everyone likes it or not, much that goes on in the context of wicked challenges needs to be socially constructed.
Making Sense of the “New GroupThink” | Humantific
The first example of this is the Pixar headquarters. Lehrer made it clear that Brian Uzzi considered it much easier to work together and share ideas with people you are familiar with than to be embarrassed to share your outlandish ideas with strangers that may think your thoughts are bizarre. Leave A Comment Cancel Reply. First off, Lehrer attempts to prove why brainstorming, as we know it, does not lead to the most creative results possible.
Argument has been the default dynamic in western culture for hundreds of years so not much of a change prescription there.
From a research perspective one could conceivably: To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: