ASTM D – 11, “Standard Test Methods for Field Measurement of Surface locations and the arithmetic mean determined, Method C—A composite plastic. ASTM D, Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast Appendix C: Additional Considerations when Measuring Surface Profile. ASTM D – 11 Standard Test Methods for Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast Method C—A composite plastic tape is impressed into.

Author: Fauktilar Sazil
Country: Uganda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 12 December 2017
Pages: 142
PDF File Size: 13.52 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.55 Mb
ISBN: 940-1-92628-869-8
Downloads: 50012
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Taran

Additional Considerations Measuring surface profile exposed by waterjetting units Profile may vary considerably. For Method C, there are various ranges of replica tape that can be employed.

While both the depth micrometer and replica tape methods conform to ASTM D, the measurement acquisition principles are quite different. Methods of generating various peak densities asgm described in the articles, and are based on abrasive size, shape, hardness and other factors. A test apparatus is attached to the loading fixture and aligned to pull perpendicularly. An interlaboratory research initiative for the purpose of generating precision and bias statements for Dis planned for Method B depth micrometer incorporates a special spring-tension micrometer with a 1-inch 2.

Precautions Determining surface profile on flame cut edges Removal of carburization hardening may be required prior to blast cleaning Effect of existing surface profile on newly generated surface profile Existing profile beneath coating may exceed specified profile for maintenance painting. Information relating to testing the tensile adhesion strength of coatings applied to surfaces other than steel will be removed from D during revisions that are also planned for What is Surface Profile and Why is it Necessary?

Coating manufacturers and others mefhod the user community found the practice to be cumbersome and time methd, and rarely did the facility owners require the level of testing dictated metho the standard. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee, which you may attend.

Standards for Measurement of Surface Profile. The study was conducted in and is close to completion. Locations of tests; test method s ; test results; conformance to specification The magnitude of the non-conforming surface profile measurement areas must be determined, marked and recorded as described earlier.

  ISO 21630 PDF

Coarse replica tape is used to measure the actual roughness of mehtod containing a profile from 0. The cleaning agents are used in a particular order of increasing aggressiveness to determine which one can remove the graffiti, with limits on level of gloss reduction and color difference to the affected coating.

Each area is marked giving the nominal pro?

William D. Corbett KTA-Tator, Inc.

Members of Subcommittee D This includes personalizing content and advertising. Revisions to the entire test method are also in process.

So, in effect the reading on the micrometer or the RTR from the replica tape represents several peaks and valleys, while the depth micrometer does not. There are additional techniques suitable for laboratory use not covered by these test methods. All the surfaces may not have functional requirements and need. Mrthod plan is currently under development for an interlaboratory study on the various methods used to extract and analyze samples, as described in the method.

William D. Corbett KTA-Tator, Inc. – ppt video online download

How is Surface Profile Depth Quantified? The distance between the highest peak and the lowest valley within any given evaluation length Rmax: Leave this field empty. Since corrosion products expand sstm they s4417 beneath a coating film, the coating may disbond, leaving the substrate unprotected.

Profile Method – Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters ISOPreparation of steel substrates before application of paints and related products – Surface roughness characteristics of blast-cleaned steel substrates Part 4: Report the range of results from all locations as the surface pro? Currently, this subcommittee has eight task groups that are working on 13 ASTM standards, four of which are proposed standards and nine of which are existing standards that have been slated for revision or renewal, or that have been recently published and require the development of precision and bias statements through interlaboratory research initiatives.

Typical comparator surfaces are prepared with steel shot, steel grit, or sand or other nonmetallic abrasive, since the appearance of the pro? The data to support these statements will be generated via an interlaboratory study, which is planned for There are additional techniques suitable for laboratory use not covered by these test methods. Chloride contamination is the result of exposure to marine or coastal environments, chemical processes, or exposure to deicing materials i.


What is Surface Profile and Why is it Necessary? The decision astm d method c to score has been left to the parties requiring the testing and those conducting it.

In response to these and other issues, Subcommittee D Replica tape for measuring surface roughness in excess of 4. The pattern of surface roughness is replicated by burnishing the tape, effectively pressing the compressible foam into the surface roughness.

Earl Bowry, Jotun Paints, Inc. Last previous edition approved in as D — 93 See Figures 1314 NOTE 1—Optical microscope methods serve as a referee method for surface pro? A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Both the structure and the coating system protecting the structure will move while in service.

Historical Version s — view previous versions of standard. Once the surface profile pattern has been replicated into the tape, it is removed from the surface and placed in a special spring tension anvil micrometer.

According to ASTM D, a d44177 of 2 readings is obtained per area; the average of the two readings is reported. Same Surface, Different Results? Naturally, the ability to generate reliable data between users employing different instruments, as well as the ability of one user to generate repeatable data using a single instrument, must be assessed.

My xstm Profile Feedback Log out. Production Manager Ellett Industries September 14, Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee,1which you may attend Copyright?

However, thick film coatings i.