A brief synoptic parallel — Taking the side of the ‘modern’ in philosophy — Old and new relations between science and philosophy — Matrices and principles. Anti-Badiou relates the parallel stories of Badiou’s Maoist ‘ontology of the void’ and Laruelle’s own performative practice of ‘non-philosophy’. : Anti-Badiou: The Introduction of Maoism into Philosophy ( ) by Francois Laruelle and a great selection of similar New, Used and.
|Published (Last):||19 April 2005|
|PDF File Size:||19.62 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.87 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The scope inteoduction, for Laruelle, merely exists because each of these domains is another bit of material that can be used. Badiou’s Being and Event: In turn, Laruelle explains the contrast introduftion his own non-philosophy as a true democracy of thought that breaks philosophy’s continual enthrall with mathematics and instead opens up a myriad of ‘non-standard’ places where thinking can be found and practised.
Post was not sent – check your email addresses! Read more Read less. The subtitle “The Introduction of Maoism Into Philosophy” provides the framing metaphor of the whole book, one whose whose conceptual content and utility is quite low. The four truth-conditions, or privileged hte, that philosophy must interact with are science mathematicspolitics communism, namely in its Maoist variant for much of his worklove which has as its science psychoanalysisand art here Badiou has vacillated between poetry and film as the vanguard of the truth in art.
An Essay on the Understanding of Evil. If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? Does this in any way sound like Badiou? Customers who viewed this item also viewed. In what follows I will unpack the meaning of all of this through a summary of the book, but breaking off here and there to undertake a more focused discussion of the polemic, of what it reveals about Badiou’s philosophy, and of the comparison that Laruelle makes between that philosophy and his own project of “non-philosophy”.
Withoutabox Submit to Film Festivals. But Laruelle’s engagement is more careful and narrow than those ready to “Sokalize” his work might expect. Philosophy and its Conditions.
Short note on Laruelle’s Anti-Badiou
The World Before Worlds: Other editions – View all Anti-Badiou: From this very programmatic chapter he then moves to two chapters that make up the primary polemic of the book.
Notify me of new posts via email. Most of his targets, however, have not been philosophers of talent equal to his own, and so he has rarely risked as much as Laruelle does here. Contents 1 A brief synoptic parallel.
Anti-Badiou: The Introduction of Maoism into Philosophy – Francois Laruelle – Google Books
Sign in to use this feature. Please try again later. Badiou, because of his Communist affiliations, and because of my own affiliation to Off ways of thinking and provocation fit my temperament. Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty. It is worth noting that in these chapters Laruelle’s aping of Badiou’s polemical style is fully displayed and that many of the most entertaining lines are found here.
But Laruelle goes to great pains to stress that the project is not really an attack against Badiou the person; instead Badiou’s work represents a paramount case of the essence of philosophy or “Philosophy”, as Mackay translates ” la-philosophie”. For Badiou philosophy produces no truths of its own.
In short, there is a certain similarity between their ideas concerning the relationship of philosophy and other disciplines or forms of knowledge. Christopher Norris – – Continuum.
Anti-Badiou relates the parallel stories of Badiou’s Maoist ‘ontology of the void’ and Laruelle’s own performative practice of ‘non-philosophy’ and explains why the two are in fact radically different. In this regard, philosophy cannot be the domain of truth over and against other practices. Amazon Rapids Fun stories for kids on the go.
It must always draw its truths out of these truth procedures: And while Badiou’s Maoism is criticized here, Laruelle takes up the famous dictum of Mao and himself struggles on two fronts, critiquing Badiou the Philosopher and developing his own non-standard philosophy introducction each along the way. Write a customer review.